Tápcsatornai endoszkópos eljárásokkal összefüggo infekciós kockázat a SARS-CoV-2-járvány idején.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 significantly affects endoscopic labs' workflow. Endoscopic examinations are considered high-risk for virus transmission. OBJECTIVES: To determine impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Hungarian endoscopic labs' workflow and on infection risk of endoscopic staff. METHOD: A nation-wide, cross-sectional online questionnaire was sent to heads of endoscopic labs in Hungary. The average number (with 95% confidence intervals) of upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies performed in 2020 was compared to that in 2019. The number of SARS-CoV-2-infected endoscopic staff members and the source of infection was also investigated. RESULTS: Completion rate was 30% (33/111). Neither the number of upper (1.593 [743-1.514] vs. 1.129 [1.020-2.166], p = 0.053), nor that of lower gastrointestinal endoscopies (1.181 [823-1.538] vs. 871 [591-1.150], p = 0.072) decreased in 2020, but both upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies' number decreased by 80% during peak phases. Separate examination room was available in 12% of institutes. Appropriate quality personal protective equipment (PPE) was available during the first and second peak phase in 70% and 82%, respectively. Infection risk stratification by questionnaire and PCR testing was routinely performed in 85% and 42%, respectively. Employee number decreased by 33% and 26% for physicians, and by 19% and 21% for assistants during peak phases, mainly due to age restrictions and COVID care assignments. 32% of assistants and 41% of physicians were infected (associated with inappropriate PPE use in 16% and 18%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Peak phases' restrictions increase endoscopic workload afterwards. Despite PPE availability, 15% of employees' COVID infection resulted from inappropriate PPE use in pre-vaccination era. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(46): 1814-1822.

Conception and reality: Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination among Hungarian IBD patients on biologic treatments.

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease potentially elevates the risk of infections, independently from age, while the disease activity and medical treatment(s) can also increase the risks. Nevertheless, it is necessary to clarify these preconceptions as well during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An observational, questionnaire based study was conducted in Hungary between February and August 2021. 2 questionnaires were completed. The first questionnaire surveyed the impact of the pandemic on patients with biologic treatments and assessed the severity and outcome of the infection, whereas the second one assessed vaccination rate and adverse events. Results: 472 patients participated in the study. 16.9 % of them acquired the infection and 6.3 % needed hospitalization. None of them required ICU care. Male sex elevated the risk of infection (p = 0.008), while glove (p = 0.02) and mask wearing (p = 0.005) was the most effective prevention strategy. Nevertheless, abstaining from community visits or workplace did not have an impact on the infection rate. Smoking, age, and disease type did not elevate the risk. UC patients had poorer condition during the infection (p = 0.003); furthermore, the disease activity could potentially worsen the course of infection (p = 0.072). The different biological treatments were equally safe; no difference was observed in the infection rate, course of COVID-19. Azathioprine and corticosteroids did not elevate the infection rate. 28 patients (35.0 %) suspended the ongoing biologic treatment, but it had no impact on the disease course. However, it resulted in changing the current treatment (p = 0.004). 9.8 % of the respondents were sceptic about being vaccinated, and 90 % got vaccinated. In one case, a serious flare-up occurred. Discussion: Most patients acquired the infection at workplace. Biologic therapies had no effect on the COVID-19 infection, whereas male sex, an active disease, and UC could be larger threat than treatments. Vaccination was proved to be safe, and patient education is important to achieve mass vaccination of the population.

Pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum and pre-existing lung pathology in ventilated COVID-19 patients: a cohort study.

Background: There is an increasing number of reports on developing pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum among severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2019 (SARS-COVID-19) patients. The aim of our study was whether pre-existing diffuse lung pathology increases visceral pleural vulnerability resulting in pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients? Methods: A total of 138 consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Petz Aladár University Teaching Hospital between 1st March 2020 and 1st February 2021 were included. Sixty/138 (43.48%) patients had one or more computer tomography scans of the chest. Analysis was focused on the image defined lung conditions during artificial ventilation. Results: Thirteen out of 60 ventilated patients developed pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum proven by computer tomography (9.42%). Three/13 patients suffered from pre-existing lung parenchyma pathology, while 10/13 had only COVID-19 infection-related image abnormality. Forty-three/60 patient had healthy lung pre-COVID. Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman correlation and Cox regression calculations did not reveal any statistically significant result proving increased vulnerability during pressure support therapy and visceral pleural breakdown in patients with pre-existing lung pathologies. Conclusions: Pre-existing lung pathology does not increase the risk of onset of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum in comparation with previously healthy lungs of ventilated COVID-19 patients.

Approaching Protein Aggregation and Structural Dynamics by Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Paramagnetic Perturbation.

PENELOP (Paramagnetic Equilibrium vs Nonequilibrium magnetization Enhancement or LOss Perturbation) is the presented nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) approach to identify at once the location of proteins' exposed surface, hindered accessibility, and exchange processes occurring on a µs-ms time scale. In addition to mapping the protein surface accessibility, the application of this method under specific conditions makes it possible to distinguish conformational mobility and chemical exchange processes, thereby providing an alternative to characterization by more demanding techniques (transverse relaxation dispersion, saturation transfer, and high-pressure NMR). Moreover, its high sensitivity enables studying samples at low, physiologically more relevant concentrations. Association, dynamics, and oligomerization are addressed by PENELOP for a component of SARS-CoV-2 replication transcription complex and an amyloidogenic protein.

Differentiating Phenotypes of Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pneumonia by Electric Impedance Tomography.

Introduction: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia has different phenotypes. Selecting the patient individualized and optimal respirator settings for the ventilated patient is a challenging process. Electric impedance tomography (EIT) is a real-time, radiation-free functional imaging technique that can aid clinicians in differentiating the "low" (L-) and "high" (H-) phenotypes of COVID-19 pneumonia described previously. Methods: Two patients ("A" and "B") underwent a stepwise positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) recruitment by 3 cmH2O of steps from PEEP 10 to 25 and back to 10 cmH2O during a pressure control ventilation of 15 cmH2O. Recruitment maneuvers were performed under continuous EIT recording on a daily basis until patients required controlled ventilation mode. Results: Patients "A" and "B" had a 7- and 12-day long trial, respectively. At the daily baseline, patient "A" had significantly higher compliance: mean ± SD = 53 ± 7 vs. 38 ± 5 ml/cmH2O (p < 0.001) and a significantly higher physiological dead space according to the Bohr-Enghoff equation than patient "B": mean ± SD = 52 ± 4 vs. 45 ± 6% (p = 0.018). Following recruitment maneuvers, patient "A" had a significantly higher cumulative collapse ratio detected by EIT than patient "B": mean ± SD = 0.40 ± 0.08 vs. 0.29 ± 0.08 (p = 0.007). In patient "A," there was a significant linear regression between the cumulative collapse ratios at the end of the recruitment maneuvers (R 2 = 0.824, p = 0.005) by moving forward in days, while not for patient "B" (R 2 = 0.329, p = 0.5). Conclusion: Patient "B" was recognized as H-phenotype with high elastance, low compliance, higher recruitability, and low ventilation-to-perfusion ratio; meanwhile patient "A" was identified as the L-phenotype with low elastance, high compliance, and lower recruitability. Observation by EIT was not just able to differentiate the two phenotypes, but it also could follow the transition from L- to H-type within patient "A." Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04360837.

COVID-19 mortality is associated with low vitamin D levels in patients with risk factors and/or advanced age.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although conclusive evidence is yet lacking, it has been suggested that vitamin D deficiency (VD) may be associated with a more severe course of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19). In this retrospective study we assessed the association of VD deficiency with mortality in a group of COVID-19 patients treated in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Data of 257 Covid-19 patients hospitalized between 30th September 2020 and 2nd March 2021 have been collected retrospectively. The following parameters were collected: age, gender, serum level of 25-OH-Vitamin D3, outcome (survival/death), comorbidities (cancer, diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Serum VD measurement was done within 3 days of admission. RESULTS: VD levels were significantly lower in patients who did not survive, however, in this patients' group the average age was significantly higher than among those, who survived. After age-matching, in a subgroup of patients with risk factors and/or 60 years of age or older who survived had significantly higher VD level in their serum than those who deceased. Serum C-reactive protein, lactate-dehydrogenase and creatinin-kinase were significantly higher in the group in which the patients died, however these laboratory parameters did not correlate with the VD levels. CONCLUSION: We found that in COVID-19 infection, when old age as risk factor (60 years of age or older) was pooled with risk factors (cancer, diabetes and/or COPD), the VD levels were significantly lower in the patient group, in which the patients did not survive. We suggest further, prospective studies in similar subgroups to explore a possible causal relationship.

Koronavírus-járvány a V4-országokban· - társadalmi, gazdasági hatások, regionális összefüggések, kormányzati beavatkozások

A 2019 végén Kínában elkezdődött COVID-19-járvány 2020 kora tavaszán megjelent és gyorsan terjedni kezdett Európában is. Az egyes országok különböző sebességgel és módon reagáltak a járványra. Az intézkedések elsősorban a terjedés megakadályozását célozták. A járványgörbe ellaposítását elősegítő beavatkozások ellenére a járvány minden nemzetgazdaságot negatívan érintett. A szakértői becslések egyaránt a peszszimista és a tragikus forgatókönyveket helyezték előtérbe. Abban egyetértettek, hogy a járvány minden országra és minden iparágra hatással lesz, továbbá abban is, hogy vannak olyan iparágak (például turizmus, vendéglátás, szórakoztatóipar), ahol rövid és hosszú távon is erős negatív hatása lesz a válságnak, míg más iparágakban (például gyógyszeripar) lehetnek óvatos optimista várakozások is. Az egyes országok a járvány első hulláma alatt különböző gazdaságvédő és kárenyhítő intézkedésekkel próbálták tompítani a válság negatív hatásait. A tanulmány bemutatja, hogy a visegrádi négyek (Csehország, Lengyelország, Magyarország és Szlovákia) gazdaságára 2020 és 2021 tavasza között milyen hatással volt a járvány okozta gazdasági válság, mely iparágak voltak a leginkább kitettek a negatív hatásoknak. A szerzők azt is vizsgálják, hogyan hatott ez a kapcsolódó iparágakra, illetve a társadalomra. A leginkább érintett iparágak regionális koncentrációját figyelembe véve bemutatják továbbá a válság gazdasági hatásainak regionális megjelenését, továbbá azt is, hogy a járvány kitörésétől 2021 márciusáig hogyan alakultak a fertőzöttségi és halálozási mutatók, valamint, hogy milyen intézkedéseket hoztak a V4-országok tágabban szemlélve a gazdaság, szűkebben pedig az egyes kiemelt iparágak esetén. A tanulmány figyelemmel kíséri a gazdaság legkisebb szereplőinek (kis- és középvállalkozói szektor, fogyasztók) védelmében hozott intézkedéseket, valamint kísérletet tesz a beavatkozások várható hatásának becslésére is.Alternate The COVID-19-epidemic, which began in China at the end of 2019, appeared in the early spring of 2020 in Europe and began to spread rapidly. Each country tried to respond to the rolling out of the epidemic at different speed and in different ways. The interventions were related to nonproliferation mainly. Despite interventions to flatten the epidemic curve, the crisis negatively affected all economies. Experts brought to the fore pessimistic and tragic scenarios. Everyone agreed that the epidemic would affect every country and every industry. Experts also agreed that there are industries (e.g. tourism, hospitality, entertainment) where the crisis will have a very strong negative impact both in the short and long term, while other industries (eg pharmaceuticals) may have cautiously optimistic expectations. During the first wave of the epidemic, countries tried to mitigate the negative effects of the crisis with various economic protection and compensation measures. In our research, we show the impact of the economic crisis caused by the epidemic on the economy of the Visegrad countries between spring 2020 and that of 2021. We analysed which industries are most exposed to the negative effects. We examined how this affected related industries and the society. Considering the regional concentration of the most affected industries, we present the regional aspects of the economic consequences of the crisis in the four countries concerned. We show how infection and mortality rates evolved from the outbreak to March 2021, and what interventions were taken by each state by looking at the economy in a more broad perspective as well as in a narrower sense at each of the key industries. We paid special attention to the measures taken in order to protect the smallest players of the economy (SME sector, consumers) and we also try to estimate the expected impact of the interventions.

Safety-Critical Control of Active Interventions for COVID-19 Mitigation.

The world has recently undergone the most ambitious mitigation effort in a century, consisting of wide-spread quarantines aimed at preventing the spread of COVID-19. The use of influential epidemiological models of COVID-19 helped to encourage decision makers to take drastic non-pharmaceutical interventions. Yet, inherent in these models are often assumptions that the active interventions are static, e.g., that social distancing is enforced until infections are minimized, which can lead to inaccurate predictions that are ever evolving as new data is assimilated. We present a methodology to dynamically guide the active intervention by shifting the focus from viewing epidemiological models as systems that evolve in autonomous fashion to control systems with an "input" that can be varied in time in order to change the evolution of the system. We show that a safety-critical control approach to COVID-19 mitigation gives active intervention policies that formally guarantee the safe evolution of compartmental epidemiological models. This perspective is applied to current US data on cases while taking into account reduction of mobility, and we find that it accurately describes the current trends when time delays associated with incubation and testing are incorporated. Optimal active intervention policies are synthesized to determine future mitigations necessary to bound infections, hospitalizations, and death, both at national and state levels. We therefore provide means in which to model and modulate active interventions with a view toward the phased reopenings that are currently beginning across the US and the world in a decentralized fashion. This framework can be converted into public policies, accounting for the fractured landscape of COVID-19 mitigation in a safety-critical fashion.

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the workflow of endoscopy units: an international survey.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a challenge to healthcare. Staff and patients are at increased risk during an examination or intervention, so certain restrictions ought to be introduced. Hence, we aimed to measure the effect of the pandemic on endoscopy units in real-life settings. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, carried out between 7 April and 15 June 2020. Responds came from many countries, and the participation was voluntary. The survey contained 40 questions, which evaluated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the endoscopy units and assessed the infection control. RESULTS: A total of 312 questionnaires were filled, 120 from Hungary, and 192 internationally, and 54 questionnaires (17.3%) were sent from high-risk countries; 84.9% of the gastroenterologists declared that they read the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) statement, while only 32.1% participated in any advanced training at their workplace. Overall, 92.1% of gastroenterologists realized risk stratification, and 72.1% claimed to have enough protective equipment. In 52.6% of the endoscopy units, at least one endoscopist had to discontinue the work due to any risk factor, while 40.6% reported that the reduced staff did not affect the workflow. Gastroenterologists considered that the five most important examinations both in low and high-risk patients are the following: lower/upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with hemodynamic instability, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in obstructive jaundice, foreign body in the esophagus, ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis, and iron deficiency anemia with hemodynamic instability, which correlates well with the ESGE recommendation. Significant correlation was found in the usage of the necessary protective equipment in high-risk patients depending on the countries (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The survey found weak correlation in preliminary training depending on countries; nevertheless, in Hungary during the examined period, endoscopists considered the recommendations more strictly than in other countries. Although many physicians left the endoscopy lab, the workflow was not affected, probably due to the reduced number of examinations.

The complex relationship between viruses and inflammatory bowel disease - review and practical advices for the daily clinical decision-making during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak emerged in December 2019 in China and rapidly spread worldwide. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are likely to be more susceptible to viral infections, and this is significantly influenced by the type of therapy they receive. Thus, issues specifically concerning the medical treatment of IBD patients were shortly addressed at the beginning of the pandemic. However, recently available data on the occurrence and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in IBD patients does not address the concerns raised at the beginning of the pandemic. Growing evidence and the rapid changes happening over the past few weeks have helped elucidate the current situation, contribute to our understanding of the disease, and many previously raised questions could now be answered. We hereby summarise available evidence regarding viral infections and IBD, focusing on SARS-CoV infections, and we provide practical recommendations related to patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic era.

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on workflows and infection prevention strategies of endoscopy units in Hungary: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals in endoscopic labs have an elevated risk for COVID-19 infection, therefore, we aimed to determine the effect of current pandemic on the workflow and infection prevention and control strategies of endoscopy units in real-life setting. METHODS: All members of Hungarian Society of Gastroenterology were invited between 7 and 17 April 2020 to participate in this cross-section survey study and to complete an online, anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: Total of 120 endoscopists from 83 institutes were enrolled of which 35.83% worked in regions with high cumulative incidence of COVID-19. Only 33.33% of them had undergone training about infection prevention in their workplace. 95.83% of endoscopists regularly used risk stratification of patients for infection prior endoscopy. While indications of examinations in low risk patients varied widely, in high-risk or positive patients endoscopy was limited to gastrointestinal bleeding (95.00%), removal of foreign body from esophagus (87.50%), management of obstructive jaundice (72.50%) and biliary pancreatitis (67.50%). Appropriate amount of personal protective equipment was available in 60.85% of endoscopy units. In high-risk or positive patients, surgical mask, filtering facepiece mask, protective eyewear and two pairs of gloves were applied in 30.83%, 76.67%, 90.00% and 87.50% of cases, respectively. Personal protective equipment fully complied with European guideline only in 67.50% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Survey found large variability in indications of endoscopy and relative weak compliance to national and international practical recommendations in terms of protective equipment. This could be improved by adequate training about infection prevention.

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic ­ practical advices: (A COVID­19-pandémia orvosszakmai kérdései) / A gyulladásos bélbetegségek kezelése a SARS-CoV-2-járvány idején - gyakorlati javaslatok

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are more susceptible to severe viral infections requiring hospitalization regardless of treatment. Immunosuppressives and biological treatments multiply the chances of opportunistic and lung infections, especially in combination therapy, so due to the new coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2) epidemic, which primarily causes respiratory disease, it is advisable to use different therapeutic considerations for effective and safe patient care. Contrary to the expectations, a study from Italy and China each, despite of the large number of infected cases, did not report any SARS-CoV-2 positivity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, which can be due to a number of favorable factors, such as the lower average age of the patients, lack of comorbidities, etc. However, it should not be forgotten that the patients on immunosuppressive and/or biological therapy belong to the compromised group. Consequently, in some cases there is a need to modify the therapy, but we should keep in mind that the relapse alongside with the need of medical consultation and even hospitalization elevate the chance of being infected. Thus, flare-ups ought to be avoided as far as they can be, so continuing the already started maintenance therapy can be a reasonable solution, but, in the high-risk group, modifying it can be reasonable as well. Our aim with this article is to make the health care more effective, and to give a practical recommendation for physicians during the epidemic, based on international publications. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(25): 1022-1027.

Diagnostic consideration and bedside estimation of the prognosis in COVID-19 patients / [Diagnosztikus lépések és a betegség prognózisának becslése COVID­19-fertozött betegeken]

In December 2019, a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown origin occured in Wuhan, China. The identified infective agent is a novel corona virus called "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2" (SARS-CoV-2) and the respiratory disease caused by this agent aquired the name "coronavirus disease 2019" (COVID-19). In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the novel coronavirus outbreak a pandemic. We reviewed the international literature regarding the novel coronavirus outbreak. Here below, we focus mainly on the diagnostic issues of COVID-19 and on the estimation of the prognosis. We detail the relevant anamnestic factors and initial examination results which serve as basics for the clinical suspicion of COVID-19. We also focus on the proper method of microbiological sampling and the relevant informations regarding diagnostic tests like the gold standard real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2. We also cite the current national epidemiologic regulations of testing for novel coronavirus. In the last section, we emphasize the importance and the potential way of early identification of high-risk patients. The COVID-19 pandemic may cause substantial epidemiological and healthcare burden even in Hungary. In addition to the epidemiologic interventions aiming the deceleration of the outbreak, the early identification and the correct hospital treatment remain key issues since these may influence mortality. The chances of the critically ill patients could be improved solely by a high-quality and careful critical care. It is prudent to meet the experiences of colleagues working hard with these patients in the already heavily infected countries. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(17): 667­671.

Importance of the imaging techniques in the management of COVID-19-infected patients / [A képalkotó diagnosztika jelentosége a COVID­19-fertozött betegek ellátásában]

Critical-care physicians are facing a challenging process in healthcare due to the overwhelming case number of hypoxic respiratory failure patients. Pneumonia has an utmost importance in the primary pathomechanism of the development of critical illness in the COVID-19 patients. Thus, imaging techniques are situated in the frontline to aim the diagnostic decision-making, to follow up the progress and to evaluate the possible complications. Reviewing the available literature, so far the common chest CT, chest X-ray and chest wall ultrasound features are presented, and recommendations are pronounced for the indications of the different modalities. At the initial phase, the atypical presentations of the virus infection are multiplex, peripheral ground glass opacities situated in the right lower lobe of the lung evolving rapidly into a bilateral involvement of the middle and basal zones. Along with the progression, the ratio of the consolidation is increasing subsequently deteriorating into fibrosis with reticular pattern. Chest ultrasound performed at the bedside has a paramount importance to reduce the possible number of health-care worker contacts in consequence of the strict and special infection control orders established on account of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemia. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(17): 672­677.